Skip to content
UI & UX Design

UX Benchmarking: What Actually Works

Measuring usability metrics over time so design changes can be compared against a baseline.

Priya Raghunathan Head of Design 2 min read 23 views
UX Benchmarking: What Actually Works

At a glance

  • Metrics task success, time on task and satisfaction scores
  • Consistency the same tasks and method must be repeated
  • Comparisons benchmarks can compare against competitors
  • Sample size quantitative benchmarks need more participants than formative testing

Why it matters

Why it matters: Without a baseline, teams argue about whether things improved, and redesigns are judged on taste.

Best practice

  • Define core tasks to measure repeatedly
  • Keep methods identical between rounds
  • Record both success rates and satisfaction
  • Benchmark before major redesigns
  • Report changes with confidence intervals
What to do and what to avoid with UX benchmarking, side by side
Good practice against the usual mistakes, from the sources listed below.

Common pitfalls

Watch out for:

  • Changing tasks between rounds
  • Tiny samples presented as statistics
  • Benchmarks run once
  • Metrics chosen after seeing results

When to call in a specialist

Bottom line Bring in help before and after major redesigns.

Where this comes from

The figures and practices above come from the sources listed.

Working on something like this?

We take on UI & UX Design work for teams who want it done once, properly. Tell us what you are building and we will tell you honestly whether we are the right studio for it. Start a project.

Where to go next

Spotted something wrong? Report an error on this page. We correct on the page and say what changed.

All services

The work behind this article, and what it costs.

Priya Raghunathan

Interface and identity. Writes about design systems, research, and why most navigation problems are structure problems.

Keep reading