Ghost Mannequin Effect vs Image Masking
Which you need, what each costs, and when a project wants both — ghost mannequin effect compared with image masking.
Last revised
Both sit under Background Remove, and clients regularly ask which of the two they actually want. The short answer is below; the rest of this page is how to tell, what each costs, and the cases where a project needs both.
In one line each
- Ghost Mannequin Effect
- Inside necks, cuffs and hems composited from separate exposures so a garment shows fit and construction without a model or a visible form.
- Image Masking
- Alpha channel and layer masking for soft or semi-transparent edges, with the old background decontaminated out of the subject so nothing fringes on a dark layout.
Head to head
| Ghost Mannequin Effect | Image Masking | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at | From $0.99 per garment | From $0.69 per image |
| Services underneath | 10 | 18 |
| You get back | Composited garment on white or transparent; Layered master; Marketplace-spec export | — |
Pick Ghost Mannequin Effect when
Ghost Mannequin Effect:
- You need composited garment on white or transparent, which image masking does not produce
- You need layered master, which image masking does not produce
- Budget is the binding constraint: this starts at $0.99 per garment against $0.69 per image for image masking
- The job is specifically 2D ghost mannequin effects, which sits under this one
- The job is specifically 3d/360 packshot ghost mannequin effects, which sits under this one
- The job is specifically 3D ghost mannequin effects, which sits under this one
Pick Image Masking when
Image Masking:
- Budget is the binding constraint: this starts at $0.69 per image against $0.99 per garment for ghost mannequin effect
- The job is specifically alpha channel masking, which sits under this one
- The job is specifically background change, which sits under this one
- The job is specifically background transparent, which sits under this one
When you need both
Verdict More often than the question implies — the same job frequently touches both, and one team covers them, so moving between them is a conversation rather than a second supplier. If you are not sure which your files need, that is what the free trial is for. The process is the same either way: whichever you pick, the work runs through the same stages and is checked against the same bar. Background Remove sets that out.
Questions we get on this specific choice
Is one of them cheaper?
Ghost Mannequin Effect starts at $0.99 per garment and image masking at $0.69 per image. Complexity and volume move both, and the cheaper unit is not always the cheaper job.
Which is faster?
Much the same, and volume moves the number far more than the choice between these two does.
Can you tell me which one my files need?
Yes, free. Send two or three real files — that judgment is part of the trial rather than something quoted separately.
Can I switch after we start?
Yes. If the files say the other one is the right answer, we re-quote before doing the work rather than after.
Where to go from here
- Ghost Mannequin Effect — what it is, in full, with its own pricing
- Image Masking — the same for the alternative
- Background Remove pricing — both rates side by side with the US market ranges
- Try it free — 2 images, edited to your brief, and we will tell you which of the two your files need
- Get a quote if the scope is already clear
- Every rate we publish, on one page
