Clipping Path vs Ghost Mannequin Effect
Which you need, what each costs, and when a project wants both — clipping path compared with ghost mannequin effect.
Last revised
Both sit under Background Remove, and clients regularly ask which of the two they actually want. The short answer is below; the rest of this page is how to tell, what each costs, and the cases where a project needs both.
What each one is
- Clipping Path A vector path drawn around the subject with the pen tool, so the edge stays sharp at any size and the file stays re-editable. Priced by how many curves the subject actually has.
- Ghost Mannequin Effect Inside necks, cuffs and hems composited from separate exposures so a garment shows fit and construction without a model or a visible form.
The numbers
| Clipping Path | Ghost Mannequin Effect | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at | From $0.39 per image | From $0.99 per garment |
| Typical turnaround | 6–24 hours | 12–24 hours |
| You get back | Path saved in the layered file; Transparent PNG; White-background JPEG | Composited garment on white or transparent; Layered master; Marketplace-spec export |
How to decide
Go with Clipping Path when
- You need path saved in the layered file, which ghost mannequin effect does not produce
- You need transparent PNG, which ghost mannequin effect does not produce
- Budget is the binding constraint: this starts at $0.39 per image against $0.99 per garment for ghost mannequin effect
- Your deadline suits 6–24 hours rather than 12–24 hours
- The job is specifically basic clipping path, which sits under this one
- The job is specifically complex clipping path, which sits under this one
Go with Ghost Mannequin Effect when
- You need composited garment on white or transparent, which clipping path does not produce
- You need layered master, which clipping path does not produce
- Budget is the binding constraint: this starts at $0.99 per garment against $0.39 per image for clipping path
- Your deadline suits 12–24 hours rather than 6–24 hours
- The job is specifically 2D ghost mannequin effects, which sits under this one
- The job is specifically 3d/360 packshot ghost mannequin effects, which sits under this one
When a project wants both
Worth knowing: More often than the question implies — the same job frequently touches both, and one team covers them, so moving between them is a conversation rather than a second supplier. If you are not sure which your files need, that is what the free trial is for. The process is the same either way: whichever you pick, the work runs through the same stages and is checked against the same bar. Background Remove sets that out.
Questions we get on this specific choice
Is one of them cheaper?
Clipping Path starts at $0.39 per image and ghost mannequin effect at $0.99 per garment. Complexity and volume move both, and the cheaper unit is not always the cheaper job.
Which is faster?
Clipping Path typically runs 6–24 hours and ghost mannequin effect 12–24 hours. Volume moves both more than the choice does.
Can you tell me which one my files need?
Yes, free. Send two or three real files — that judgment is part of the trial rather than something quoted separately.
Can I switch after we start?
Yes. If the files say the other one is the right answer, we re-quote before doing the work rather than after.
Where to go from here
- Clipping Path — what it is, in full, with its own pricing
- Ghost Mannequin Effect — the same for the alternative
- Background Remove pricing — both rates side by side with the US market ranges
- Try it free — 2 images, edited to your brief, and we will tell you which of the two your files need
- Get a quote if the scope is already clear
- Every rate we publish, on one page
